The simple answer is, I don’t believe it exists.
As the storytelling goes, anyway. The concept of a dark villain, who wants to destroy because his heart is black; the fantastical Lord Sauron, who wishes destruction of all that is good; I don’t believe in these things.
That’s not to say they don’t exist, I suppose. In the context of our apprenticeship conversation, we are talking about cosmic forces; and there are many of these that are beyond my ken.
Keeping this in mind, I have a suspicion that spiritual forces that others interpret as malevolent are merely ambivalent to our own codes of morality. I once heard a Balinese mask described this way; with the big bulging eyes, and the pointed teeth, all of these masks impersonate deities in this way, because this is how the teeth of the most beautiful woman in the world would look…to a shrimp.
Evil, as we tend do define it, entails an uber-malevolence that is motiveless. Sentient beings – and even non-sentient beings – all have motives. When our motives come into conflict, that is where we create division, where we call one good and the other bad, one dark and one light. We often create villains in storytelling because we need a foil to the hero, who is the proof of the characteristic we are trying to embody. Unless the villain is given his own motives beyond ‘destroy, harm, undo all that is good’ then he is a shallow foil, and featureless in all real aspects.
I did a thesis on the Hero – Victim – Villain relationship once. (Masters in Physical Theater, and all.) These are the three main characters in traditional melodrama. They all serve their core roles. In good stories, the villain and the hero could be defined based solely on perspective. They both have agendas, they both can be brave or cowardly, strong or weak, powerful or impoverished, depending on the story; however, they both act decisively to attain their goals.
The only identifiable difference between a hero and a villain, when all else is torn away, is in their treatment of the Victim. Heroes protect and save the Victim. Villains take advantage of, and harm, the innocent.
Evil, then, in mortal affairs, could be distilled to this essence; harming others who have done you no wrong and cannot defend themselves. Witches have an easy edict to remind people of the Google maxim, ‘don’t be evil’: ‘An it harm none, do what ye will.’ For if it harms none, there can be no evil in it.
A protagonist in an interesting story could be faced with a moral complication, as in the fable of the hero who has the chance to kill Hitler as a baby. Kill an innocent child, and save thousands. What is the noble act? What would be evil? Which victim do you save?
These convolutions only obscure the fact that villains are heroes with an agenda opposing that of the audience’s moral bias, and heroes share the moral bias. Forgive me for interpreting this question theatrically, but that’s where my training comes from, and for many deep questions this is the thinking to which I revert.
To take a step up in perspective, from the cosmic perspective, I know we must eventually tread into the Qlippoth. I have avoided this subject in my studies, for the same reason I have avoided invocation; I don’t like to go into places like that unprepared, and I don’t know that I would ever like to go unless absolutely necessary.
Not because I fear evil, but because upon the right scale, against certain other entities I am nothing more…than a shrimp.
Bravo!
I love this thought on evil. I love how you put in into perspective of theater and villains and hero’s and victims. I love all of it. This is a really great discourse on your thoughts on evil. I ask these interesting questions to attempt to get you to think about things a little bit differently, to tread in places you otherwise wouldn’t tread alone. These questions don’t necessarily have right or wrong answers.
I have to say, I am very impressed and excited and happy with this discussion on evil. The better the discussions, the deeper I like to take the apprenticeships. Which is one way almost favors what you favor, but in the same perspective it pushes growth in the areas you are ready for.
(AND – you are not ready for invocations…. yet. So – good job staying away from those for now)
Ok… back to Evil.
It is such an interesting topic because in our society we like to use the word evil and it’s connotations of ‘good’ and ‘bad’ interchangeably. But, in esoteric study, it is quite different. Good and Bad in esoteric study is just different notes on the same scale, just as ‘light’ and ‘dark’, ying/yang, and so forth. Dark is not bad, dark is not evil (just as we spoke about for a while in the Adept Initiation), have a lower vibration instead of a higher one doesn’t make you an ‘evil’ person. In Bali (which is Hindu), they have a week long festival where they ‘celebrate’ the demons. They give the island Demon Gods a week of worship. They dress, make masks, have parades, etc, etc, etc. The name ‘Bali’ is actually the name of a Demon-king…. (anyway, I’m getting off topic) —->>>
The point is, without darkness we wouldn’t know what light is. Without pain, we wouldn’t know joy.
Evil has nothing to do with either.
Because even in darkness, even in pain, we (as humans) grow. We progress. We live.
Evil is, in essence – un-living.
In esoteric study, the technical definition of Evil is: To stop the progression of humans.
Evil is, Live, backwards.
Any thoughts?
I like that definition – ‘LIVE’ backwards, because thats what it is.
The Greeks used Evil as a concept of fate or chance, when disaster would befall you; it wasn’t something that could be attributed to human motive (as I discoursed on above) but was, instead, something that prevented the progression and life of humans.
Reviewing the ascencion ritual, I can see we will be using evil in these terms, as a counterpart of light, a shadow that can overtake. I’ll go with these definitions for vocabulary as we move forward; I can see how ‘evil,’ in this context, is useful for describing the energies at play.
Likewise, I appreciate the depth of the discussion – it makes this a fuller and more richer experience. Less evil.
Yes, less evil.
Evil in the sense of stopping progression is something to be mindful of as we move higher and higher on the tree. Fuck-ups can and will happen, but the ability to take it in stride and moving forward, to keep progressing, is something we will have to remind each other to do. (Notice I said, remind each other, I too need reminders…. )
This can also be tied into our conversation with ‘Hell’ and the Kamaloca we had earlier. Being trapped and living the same thing over and over, a ‘groundhogs day of sorts’ not progressing, constantly beating yourself up for a bad decision you made the past. Not moving forward/backward or at all. Is. Evil.
(because, sometimes, going backwards is progression too…)